Alina Khay

Alina Khay

A Rules-Based Global Momentum Alternative to Passive Investing

What a half-century backtest suggests after costs—and what it does not guarantee.

Alina Khay's avatar
Alina Khay
Nov 17, 2025
∙ Paid

This article evaluates a simple global momentum-rotation strategy against a clearly defined passive benchmark. The historical results are a backtest, not a promise of high returns. They depend on the selected universe, rebalance rule, start date, transaction-cost assumptions and availability of investable country ETFs. No untouched out-of-sample test is shown here; taxes, spreads, capacity, tracking error and parameter sensitivity may materially weaken the result.

A simpler form has been hiding in plain sight.

Illustration 1 in “A Practical High-Return Alternative to Passive Portfolio Investing”.

It keeps the core engine — the structural persistence of price trends — but removes the friction. With low-cost single-country ETFs, minimal turnover, and only few trading days per year, the Global Momentum Rotation Strategy (GMRS) delivers the same underlying edge in a form a modern investor can actually implement.

From June 1970 through December 2024, GMRS compounded at 13.09% annually, well ahead of the MSCI World’s. That 275-basis-point gap over MSCI may sound modest, but compounding makes it massive:

  • $100 → $81,600 using GMRS

  • $100 → $21,320 in the global benchmark

One small structural choice created a four-to-one wealth difference.

Chart or diagram 2 in “A Practical High-Return Alternative to Passive Portfolio Investing”.

This is what a historical pattern in this sample looks like — quiet, repeatable, and hiding behind ordinary rules.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Alina · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture